Annex 11 — Accreditation Rubric (Lab / Hub / NCU)
11.1 Purpose
This annex provides accreditation criteria for:
- Innovation Labs (Tier-0)
- Hubs (Tier-1)
- Network Coordination Unit (Tier-2)
Accreditation ensures quality, governance compliance, and system integrity.
11.2 Accreditation Principles
- Evidence-based
- Governance-compliant
- Maturity-aware
- Transparent
- Consistent across tiers
11.3 Accreditation Criteria — Innovation Labs (Tier-0)
Category A — Governance (20%)
- IGF Tier-0 compliance
- Documented decision records
- Escalation logs
Category B — Execution Quality (40%)
- IMM-P® stage completion
- Evidence quality
- Experimentation rigor
- Prototyping maturity
Category C — Documentation (20%)
- Repository structure
- Versioning discipline
- Metadata completeness
Category D — MEL Participation (20%)
- On-time KPI submissions
- Quarterly reviews
- Adoption of MEL feedback
Accreditation Outcome:
Accredited / Pending Improvements / Not Accredited
11.4 Accreditation Criteria — Hubs (Tier-1)
Category A — Capability Development (25%)
- Training delivered
- Coaching frequency
- Capability progression scores
Category B — Portfolio Governance (25%)
- Normalization accuracy
- Cross-lab synthesis quality
- Domain expertise
Category C — Documentation (25%)
- Evidence quality enforcement
- Repository hygiene checks
Category D — MEL Integration (25%)
- MEL review quality
- Trend analysis
- Benchmarking preparation
Outcome: Accredited / Conditional / Not Accredited
11.5 Accreditation Criteria — NCU (Tier-2)
Category A — Governance Leadership (30%)
- Decision-pathway authority
- Arbitration effectiveness
- Governance audits
Category B — Documentation Stewardship (30%)
- Architecture of repository
- Metadata standards
- Transparency rules
Category C — MEL & Benchmarking (40%)
- National MEL synthesis
- Benchmarking reports
- Accreditation cycle integrity
Outcome: Accredited / Conditional / Not Accredited
11.6 Licensing
Released under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.