11 — References
Editorial note (non-normative):
This chapter has been editorially refined to improve clarity and positioning of references within VILF, in alignment with the canonical manuscript. No sources or normative content have been modified.
11 – References
How to Read This Chapter
This chapter lists the foundational frameworks, global references, academic sources, and governance standards that inform VILF. These references provide context and lineage; they do not define execution requirements or prescribe workflows (OECD/Eurostat, 2018).
11.1 Foundational Frameworks
This diagram is descriptive and non-normative; it summarizes the foundational references as contextual anchors without implying priority or compliance.
- MCF 2.1
- IMM
- IMM-P®
- IGF
- MEL
Innovation management system guidance and assessment references provide alignment context for these foundations (ISO, 2019; ISO, 2019).
11.2 Innovation Lab Literature
- Nesta
- MindLab
- Helsinki Design Lab
- Policy Lab UK
- UNDP Accelerator Labs
- OECD OPSI
- GovLab
Public-sector innovation literature provides contextual grounding for lab-based capability development (OECD, 2015).
The governance sources that follow reflect public-sector accountability and institutional design.
11.3 Public-Sector Innovation & Governance
- OECD
- European Commission
- UNDP
- World Bank
- IDB
These sources align with institutional governance framing and readiness diagnostics (OECD, 2020; World Bank, 2022).
Design and systems thinking references complement the governance lens with methods for framing complex problems.
11.4 Design & Systems Thinking
- IDEO
- Stanford d.school
- Donella Meadows
- Eric Ries
- Cynefin Framework
Foresight references provide long-horizon planning and uncertainty navigation foundations.
11.5 Foresight & Futures
- UNESCO Futures Literacy
- OECD Strategic Foresight
- SOIF
- Peter Schwartz
- Herman Kahn
- UN Global Pulse
- Vigía Futura
11.6 Data, Ethics & Innovation Governance
- OECD AI Principles
- EU AI Act
- IEEE
- WEF
- GovAI
Risk and governance standards provide non-prescriptive context for integrity and oversight alignment (ISO, 2018; ISO, 2021).
Academic institutions listed below reflect research bases that inform many of these practices.
11.7 Academic Publications
- Harvard Kennedy School
- MIT GOV/LAB
- London School of Economics
- ETH Zürich
- University of Cambridge
11.8 Supplementary Sources
- national innovation strategies
- digital government strategies
- governance frameworks
Benchmarking and composite indicator methodology provide methodological context for comparative references (Nardo et al., 2008; OECD, 2023).
11.9 Connection to License
Chapter 12 describes how VILF may be shared under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.
References
OECD/Eurostat (2018) Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation. 4th edn. Paris/Eurostat: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264304604-en.
ISO (2019) ISO 56002:2019 Innovation management — Innovation management system — Guidance. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
ISO (2019) ISO/TR 56004:2019 Innovation Management Assessment — Guidance. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
OECD (2015) The Innovation Imperative in the Public Sector: Setting an Agenda for Action. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD (2020) The Public Sector Innovation Lifecycle: A device to assist public sector organisations in developing an innovation process. OECD Working Papers on Public Governance. Paris: OECD Publishing.
World Bank (2022) Digital Government Readiness Assessment (DGRA) Toolkit (online). Washington, DC: World Bank.
Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A. and Tarantola, S. (2008) Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide. Paris: OECD Publishing.
ISO (2018) ISO 31000:2018 Risk management — Guidelines. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
ISO (2021) ISO 37000:2021 Governance of organizations — Guidance. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
OECD (2023) Government at a Glance 2023. Paris: OECD Publishing.