Skip to main content

06 — Benchmarking

06 – Benchmarking

How to Read This Chapter

Benchmarking enables fair comparison, capability mapping, and evidence-based resource allocation across labs, hubs, and networks.

6.1 Purpose of Benchmarking

Benchmarking identifies:

  • performance differentials,
  • capability gaps,
  • high-performing and struggling units,
  • system learning opportunities.

6.2 Benchmarking Principles

  • Normalization
  • Evidence-Based
  • Transparency
  • Comparability
  • Purpose-Driven
  • Continuous Learning

6.3 Benchmarking Architecture

6.3.1 Tier-0

Evaluates:

  • IMM-P execution,
  • evidence completeness,
  • rigor,
  • MEL results,
  • IGF compliance.

6.3.2 Tier-1

Evaluates:

  • capability support,
  • portfolio coordination,
  • MEL review quality,
  • documentation hygiene.

6.3.3 Tier-2

Evaluates:

  • interoperability,
  • governance consistency,
  • documentation flow,
  • system learning.

6.4 Benchmarking Indicator Groups

  • Execution (IMM-P)
  • Capability (IMM)
  • Governance (IGF)
  • MEL indicators

6.5 Normalization Rules

Account for:

  • mandates,
  • maturity,
  • team size,
  • domain complexity.

6.6 Benchmarking Methods

  • comparative,
  • longitudinal,
  • cluster-based,
  • network-level.

6.7 Benchmarking Process Flow

  1. Indicator verification
  2. Data submission
  3. Normalization
  4. Consolidation
  5. Analysis
  6. MEL integration
  7. Reporting

6.8 Outputs

  • benchmarking reports,
  • capability plans,
  • funding recommendations,
  • cross-lab learning priorities.

6.9 Connection to KPIs & Scorecard

Benchmarking provides comparative context for KPI interpretation in Chapter 07.